A Perspective On Ionizing Radiation Exposure After The Japanese Wake-Up Call – Part VII – Is the Linear-No-Threshold Assumption Merely An Assumption?

By
Published on
July 1, 2015
See full article PDF
Abstract

In writing this series there were two primary controversies I wanted to address. The first, which most directly relates to the practices utilizing clinical nutrition, is that clinical nutrition, through the use of dietary changes and/or supplementation that not only includes potassium iodide but goes so much farther, can have a major impact on reducing the adverse health impact of ionizing radiation. However, the second, which I feel is just as important even though it does not directly relate to the practice of clinical nutrition, is that fear about both ionizing and non-ionizing (cell phones) radiation has not only led to reactions that are not only non-productive but sometimes detrimental to health. The best example of the idea that fear of radiation can lead to ineffective and unhealthy reactions is the desperate pursuit of potassium iodide supplements that occurred by many in this country right after the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster. It seemed that fear that the Fukushima disaster would, within a few short weeks or months, lead to a radiation-induced apocalypse in this country blinded many thousands to the fact that potassium iodine only protects the thyroid against the effects of I-131, a radioactive isotope that has such a short half life that most of it would dissipate before reaching the continental United States. In contrast, as we subsequently learned, Cesium-137, which has a much longer half life than I- 131 and is totally immune to any protective effects of potassium iodide, presents a much greater threat to health worldwide. Then, as we all know, the adverse impact of the almost irrational pursuit of potassium iodide in those days immediately following the tsunami was magnified by the fact that so many were so blinded by fear that they could not or were unable to realize that, at milligram doses significantly higher than the RDI for iodine, potassium iodide can lead to often serious health concerns.

To see full versions of the journal, become a National Nutrition Standard member today

Address:
National Nutrition Standard
1665 East 31st Street
Brooklyn, NY 11234

Contact:
540-252-4733nutritionalperspectives@nationalnutritionstandard.com
ISSN: 0160-3922
eISSN: 2770-7970
Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Nutritional Perspectives® is the peer-reviewed journal of National Nutrition Standard. The journal publishes research on nutrition related topics
Subscribe
By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy and provide consent to receive updates from our company.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
All materials © of National Nutrition Standard. All rights reserved.